303-825-2223

Client Success Stories

A History of Helping Clients Win in Criminal Cases

The criminal defense attorneys at Rosenthal & Heymann, LLC, in Denver, Colorado, have extensive experience successfully negotiating for dropped or reduced charges and defending clients in courtroom across the state.

The outcome of each case is dependent on the facts of that case and the applicable law, as interpreted by the court. A criminal defense lawyer can never honestly promise you a specific result. However, you can see from the success stories below that we fight aggressively to protect our clients’ rights.

Contact our Denver law office to get a skilled trial attorney working on your criminal case.

Drunk Driving Successes

State v. AM,

The client was charged with DUI in a case with very unfavorable facts. We discovered a procedural error on the part of the prosecution and got the case dismissed.

State v. MM:

Client charged with DUI and admitted to officers that he was "buzzed". We were able to get the client's statements suppressed and get the state to agree to dismiss the DUI charge.

State v. LL:

Our Client charged which DUI with a BAC of .168. The prosecution would not agree to a fair plea bargain. Our Client was found not guilty at trial due to our ability to challenge the validity of the government’s impairment evidence.

State v. DN:

Our minor client charged with DUI involving an accident. After filing motions attacking the state's evidence, we were able to convince the government to dismiss the DUI charge and agree to a plea to a minor offense.

State v. JB:

Client was an ROTC cadet and would lose his future career if convicted of DUI. After filing motions to suppress the State's evidence, we were able to negotiate the charges to a non-alcohol related traffic offense.

State v. JH:

Our client charged with a 2nd DUI. Our thorough knowledge of the rules of evidence enabled us to convince the State to dismiss the DUI charge and allow client to plead to a non-alcohol related traffic offense.

State v. AG:

Client was charged with felony drug possession with intent to distribute. After extended negotiations with the prosecutor, the client was offered a deferred adjudication with no jail. This meant that so long as client was on his best behavior for a period of two years, that the entire case would be dismissed!

People v. AM

Client was charged with DUI. We challenged the constitutionality of the stop. We asked for extensive relevant documentation. The Government did not turn over everything that we asked for. As a sanction for the government’s failure to properly prepare their case, the Judge dismissed all charges against out client.

People v. RD

The client was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol. The client was adamant that he was not substantially impaired. Prosecution would not fairly negotiate the case. We went to a jury trial where the jury found the client not guilty on all charges.

People v. G

The client was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol. The client was adamant that he was not impaired. At the 11th hour we convinced prosecutors to offer a plea to a non-alcohol related traffic offense.

People v. AK.

The client was on probation for a DUI case and the government was seeking to revoke her probation, which can carry possible jail time. We convinced the government to drop all charges.

People v. TB.

The client was charged with DUI in an accident case. After the government refused to fairly negotiate the case, we took the case to a jury trial. The jury acquitted our client of DUI.

People v. JC.

The client was charged with DUI. We challenged the reason for the stop as unconstitutional. The judge agreed and dismissed the case in its entirety.

People v. LL.

The client was charged with DUI. We convinced the government to drop all DUI charges.



People v. MA.

The police charged our client with DUI. We convinced the government that our client's poor performance on the roadside gymnastic maneuvers was due to prior injuries to his legs. His bad performance on the breath test was due to a malfunction in the intoxilyzer 5000 EN. The government dismissed the DUI and agreed to a minor traffic infraction.



People v. TE.

The client was charged with DUI and had a high BAC. We convinced the government that the breath test had to be wrong because client's performance on roadsides clearly indicated that he was not impaired. The government entered into an agreement whereby as long as the client met some conditions his case would be dismissed.

People v. Unnamed client

The client was on her 7th DUI. The Government wanted a lengthy jail sentence. We convinced the government that our client had a serious alcohol problem which was a combination of genetic and learned behavior. The Government agreed to no jail time and we got our client into intensive alcohol therapy.

Assault Successes

People v. M

The client was charged with assault. We convinced the government that our client was simply defending himself and that the other person was the aggressor. The Government dismissed all charges.

People v. H

The client was charged with assaulting a police officer and other serious charges. The charges carried a mandatory prison sentence. We did an extensive investigation including hiring private detectives who interviewed everyone near the scene. Witness testimony and our discovery of video evidence led to all charges being dropped against our client. The police officers who made the report against our client are now being investigated by internal affairs.

People v. S

The client was charged with assaulting police officers. We convinced the government to dismiss all charges.

Domestic Violence Successes

People v. LH.

The client was charged with domestic violence. We convinced the government to drop all charges.

People v. JR.

The client was charged with menacing, assault, and domestic violence. The government would not offer a reasonable deal. We took the case to a jury trial where the jury acquitted our client of all charges.

People v. T

The client was charged with felony stalking, felony domestic violence and other assorted charges that carried a lengthy prison sentence. We convinced the government that the charges were bogus. The government dropped all charges.

People v. CC

Client was charged with assault and domestic violence. The Government was adamant that our client had to plead guilty to these charges. We were adamant that our client was the victim of a bully who had harassed her for years. The “victim” in this case had “unclean hands” and was abusing the legal process. On the eve of trial the Government dismissed all charges and our client was totally vindicated.

Other Charges

CHILD ABUSE: People v. PH

The client was unfairly charged with child abuse. We convinced the government to drop all charges.

THEFT: People v. JR

The client was charged with theft. We were able to convince the prosecutors to dismiss all charges.

STALKING: People v. M

The client was charged with felony stalking and other serious charges. We took the case to a jury trial after the government refused to fairly negotiate the case. The jury found our client not guilty of all charges.

DRUG CRIMES: People v. G

The client was charged with the felony of distributing drugs. We convinced the government that the client was not a seller. The Government dismissed all felony charges and the client pled to a charge of simple possession which carried no jail time.

BEFORE CHARGES WERE BROUGHT: In the matter of SH.

The client was being investigated for serious charges by the police. We were able to discuss the situation with the police officers prior to them bringing charges. We were able to convince them to not bring charges against our client.

We fight hard for our clients to achieve the best possible outcome in their case. For a free consultation with a defense lawyer at Rosenthal & Heymann, LLC, call 303-825-2223 and 888-Rose-Hey or contact the firm online.

Convenient appointment scheduling · Credit cards accepted